| 1. | Suppose we are trying to factor the composite number " n ".
|
| 2. | However, no finite set of bases is sufficient for all composite numbers.
|
| 3. | In fact, only 449 superabundant and highly composite numbers are the same.
|
| 4. | However, composite numbers do make up gaps much smaller than n !.
|
| 5. | The concept is somewhat analogous to that of highly composite numbers.
|
| 6. | It is particularly effective for a composite number having a small prime factor.
|
| 7. | Usually B is given as a prime, but composite numbers work as well.
|
| 8. | How could each such composite number be the multiple of the same prime?
|
| 9. | Another way to classify composite numbers is by counting the number of divisors.
|
| 10. | Being the smallest number with exactly 9 divisors, 36 is a highly composite number.
|